Visibility across facilities
Review production status, important exceptions, responsibilities, and results without rebuilding the picture from separate files.
Gros.farm product tour
Connect the farm structure, crop technology, growing cycles, daily work, monitoring, analytics, and supported local automation in one production record.

Organizations, sites, facilities, blocks, fields, rooms, zones, crops, and growing cycles become a shared production structure.
Cultivation plans hold stages, reviewed targets, recurring work, recipes, photoperiod, and available automation parameters.
The team completes tasks and observations while manual input, sensors, weather, and supported integrations add operating data.
Monitoring and analytics show exceptions in context, while decisions, work, and crop-cycle outcomes remain connected in history.
Inside the product
These are real Gros.farm interfaces. Choose a production layer to see how the farm structure, crop plan, daily execution, current state, and result stay connected.
01 · Structure
Sites and facilities share one workspace. Each facility keeps its crops, growing cycles, people, tasks, metrics, and history.

1 / 7
A shared production foundation
Gros.farm is not a collection of disconnected tools. The farm registry identifies where production happens, the crop plan defines what should happen, the team records the work, monitoring captures the current state, and analytics explains the resulting history.
Describe sites, facilities, zones, batches, and the current production state.
Explore →What should happen?Keep stages, targets, recurring work, and operating instructions together.
Explore →What needs doing?Turn production technology and on-site events into assigned work.
Explore →What is happening?Capture the observations and values the team reviews consistently.
Explore →What changed?Compare actual values, reviewed targets, facilities, and periods.
Explore →One system, role-specific work
Access and daily views can differ, but the facility, crop cycle, stage, task, observation, and result remain connected.
Review production status, important exceptions, responsibilities, and results without rebuilding the picture from separate files.
Work with cultivation plans, observations, targets, tasks, and crop-cycle history in the same context.
Coordinate deadlines and responsibilities by facility while keeping the production reason attached to each task.
Receive assigned work with the location, date, priority, and instruction, including an offline mobile workflow.
Connected production
Gros.farm can connect supported controllers, climate computers, sensors, and irrigation nodes. Local automation remains responsible for physical operation, interlocks, emergency logic, and safe behavior when cloud connectivity is unavailable.
Connect reviewed crop-stage targets with available facility data and local control.
Reviewed strategyConfigure time slots, accumulated-radiation rules, calibration, and a local Safety schedule.
Existing infrastructureAssess a read-only or reviewed writable connection for the systems already installed.
Production context for AI
GFAi is designed to connect existing AI models to facilities, crop plans, metrics, work, events, and history. It can help assemble evidence and prepare drafts, while responsibility and confirmation stay with people.
Explore GFAiWhere Gros.farm fits best
A practical first setup
Avoid migrating the entire farm at once. Start with the structure and work the team needs now, then add history and integrations as they become useful.
Match the real production structure and confirm coordinates, time zone, and day/night schedule.
Review the current stage, target ranges, recurring work, and the monitoring set the team can maintain.
Start with the nearest work and observations; connect historical data and automation only when they support a clear result.
Product tour FAQ
No. Start with one active facility, its current crop cycle, the nearest work, and a small monitoring set. Import or reconstruct older history only when it is useful for operations or comparison.
No. Many workflows can begin with manual observations, tasks, crop plans, registry data, and weather information. Sensors and integrations are added where they improve a defined workflow.
No. Local systems remain responsible for physical operation, regulation, interlocks, emergency logic, and safety. Gros.farm adds crop context, reviewed targets, data history, and supported integrations.
Yes. Templates are starting points, not universal recommendations. Review stages, targets, tasks, recipes, and parameters for the actual crop, facility, equipment, and production objective.
It is most useful when production has repeatable crop technology, several active facilities or batches, a team, and a need to connect planned work with actual conditions and results.
See your workflow in Gros.farm
We will map the smallest useful setup and identify which data, modules, and integrations belong in the first phase.