The cultivation plan defines the target
Stage, day/night schedule, target ranges, and planned transitions describe the conditions required by the crop.
Equipment and climate
Connect crop targets to the equipment already running the facility
Gros.farm keeps the equipment list, climate targets, approved schedules, and actual history connected to the active crop cycle. The local control layer remains responsible for physical operation and safety.
- Targets can follow the current cultivation-plan stage
- Day and night values can differ by facility or zone
- Existing controllers remain the source of local reliability
English interface capture pending One operating model
Production intent, cloud context, and local execution stay separate
That separation makes responsibilities clear. Crop technology defines what the production team wants to achieve; Gros.farm organizes and records the approved targets; the engineering layer operates the equipment.
The target gains production context
Approved values are connected to the facility, zone, crop cycle, stage, responsible people, and history.
Controllers operate the physical system
PLCs, climate computers, and local nodes control ventilation, heating, circulation, dosing, and other connected equipment.
What the module supports
A shared operating view for agronomy and engineering
The useful result is not a longer device list. It is a traceable connection between a crop target, the approved configuration, the local system, and the actual conditions recorded afterward.
Stage-specific setpoints
Use reviewed day and night values associated with the active cultivation-plan stage, or enter approved values manually.
Gradual changes between stages
Where supported, define a transition rate so a new target is introduced progressively instead of as an abrupt step.
Equipment tied to the right facility
Keep sensors, actuators, local nodes, and available capabilities connected to the facility or zone they actually serve.
Actual values beside the target
Review temperature, humidity, CO₂, and other available data against approved target ranges and crop-stage context.
Schedules and interval modes
For supported systems, schedules can include operating windows, run periods, pauses, and other reviewed parameters.
Changes that can be traced
Keep the target, approval context, transmitted configuration, and subsequent production history in one workflow.
From connection to routine use
Start with one facility and one useful climate workflow
A narrow first scope makes the engineering boundary easier to validate and gives the production team a result it can maintain.
- 01
Map the facility and zones
Confirm which equipment, sensors, and local controllers belong to each physical production area.
- 02
Choose the target parameters
Select the few climate parameters the team will review consistently, such as air temperature, humidity, or CO₂.
- 03
Review the data and control interface
Check the protocol, available signals, units, update frequency, writable settings, and local safety constraints.
- 04
Approve the first configuration
The agronomy and engineering owners confirm the target values, schedules, and responsibility boundary.
- 05
Compare target and actual history
Use the resulting data to understand how the facility operated during a specific crop stage and period.
Product view
Keep configuration and performance in the same production story
The current product screens below are temporarily shown in Russian. The workflow and data model are the same; English interface captures can replace them without changing the page structure.
Responsibility boundary
Gros.farm works above the physical control layer
Cloud configuration and analytics must never be treated as a substitute for local engineering protection. Compatibility and writable control always require an assessment of the actual facility.
Local engineering system
- physically operates pumps, fans, valves, heating, and other equipment;
- runs local regulation, interlocks, emergency logic, and protective scenarios;
- continues safe operation according to its local configuration if connectivity is lost.
Gros.farm
- connects targets and schedules to the crop, stage, facility, and zone;
- collects available data and keeps production history;
- sends reviewed configuration only through a supported and agreed integration.
Plan a pilot
Prepare the information needed for an engineering assessment
A useful first discussion is based on the real installation, not a generic equipment catalog.
- 01
Facility and zone diagram
Show which production areas are served by each controller and equipment group.
- 02
Controller and protocol details
Provide model names, available interfaces, current programs, and any existing gateway or API.
- 03
One measurable production objective
Choose a result such as climate history by crop stage or approved target handoff for one zone.
Questions before implementation
What teams usually need to clarify
Does Gros.farm replace a climate computer, PLC, or SCADA system?
No. The local system remains responsible for physical operation, regulation, interlocks, and safety. Gros.farm adds crop-stage targets, production context, data history, and supported configuration workflows.
Can we start by reading data without sending settings?
Yes. A read-only first phase is often the safest and most useful way to validate units, signal quality, facility mapping, and the value of the resulting history.
Will any controller or sensor work automatically?
No. Compatibility depends on the controller, protocol, wiring, data access, units, and facility configuration. The actual interface must be assessed before connection.
What happens when the internet connection is lost?
Local regulation and protective scenarios should continue according to the local system configuration. Cloud synchronization, remote changes, and some analytics may be temporarily unavailable.
Can climate targets come from a cultivation plan?
Yes, where the workflow is configured and reviewed. A cultivation-plan stage can provide approved day and night targets, but responsible specialists remain accountable for the values and their application.
Start with the actual facility
Map one useful workflow before expanding the scope
Show us the production area, current system, responsible roles, and the result you want. We will help define a practical first phase.